{"id":2967,"date":"2012-04-20T10:22:23","date_gmt":"2012-04-20T17:22:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/?p=2967"},"modified":"2025-12-10T02:18:57","modified_gmt":"2025-12-10T10:18:57","slug":"electron-is-not-a-fundamental-particle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/electron-is-not-a-fundamental-particle\/","title":{"rendered":"Electron No Longer a Fundamental Particle ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_3097\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/electron-is-not-a-fundamental-particle\/spincharge\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-3097\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3097\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3097\" title=\"Spin-Charge Separation Graph\" src=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/SpinCharge-300x290.jpg\" alt=\"Spin-Charge Separation Graph\" width=\"300\" height=\"290\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/SpinCharge-300x290.jpg 300w, https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/SpinCharge.jpg 502w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3097\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Spin-Charge Separation Graph<br \/>Credit: Nature, Schlappa et al<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Amazing news: Researchers in Switzerland have separated an Electron into two smaller quasi-particles &#8211; a &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Spinon\">Spinon<\/a>&#8221; and an &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Orbiton\">Orbiton<\/a>;&#8221; meaning they have <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">physically separated<\/span> the spin and the orbit properties of an Electron.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Until now, standard physics generally accepted that an Electron was a fundamental particle &#8211; that it was not made of smaller components.<\/p>\n<p>However, as early as 1980 theorists had predicted an electron could be made of three smaller pieces: A &#8220;Spinon&#8221; (providing spin), an &#8220;Orbiton&#8221; (providing the orbit) and a &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Holon_(physics)\">Holon<\/a>&#8221; (carrying the charge).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><a href=\"http:\/\/prl.aps.org\/abstract\/PRL\/v77\/i19\/p4054_1\">In 1996, physicists theorized that an electron might split into a holon and spinon.<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2011\/07\/110720103517.htm\">In 1996, American physicists C. L. Kane and Matthew Fisher made a theoretical prediction that if you confine electrons to individual atomic chains, the Wiedemann-Franz law could be strongly violated. In this one-dimensional world, the electrons split into two distinct components or excitations, one carrying spin but not charge (the spinon), the other carrying charge but not spin (the holon).<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This year Swiss and German researchers<sup>1<\/sup> led by experimenter Thorsten Schmitt fired a tightly focused X-ray beam at a copper-oxide compound called &#8220;<strong>strontium cuprate<\/strong>,&#8221; special because <strong>particles in it can only move in one-dimension, one degree of freedom<\/strong> &#8211; forward or backwards.<\/p>\n<p>They observed an electron split into two of the three predicted parts &#8211; a Spinon and an Orbitron.<\/p>\n<p>What solidified their observation is finding distinct properties for the two parts. &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471\">These <\/a><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471\">quasiparticles can move with different speeds and even in different directions in the material<\/a><\/strong>,&#8221; said Jeroen van den Brink, a condensed-matter physicist at the Institute for Theoretical Solid State Physics in Dresden, Germany.<\/p>\n<p>For more here is a news report in Nature Journal &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/not-quite-so-elementary-my-dear-electron-1.10471\">Not-quite-so elementary, my dear electron<\/a>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The original paper: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/vaop\/ncurrent\/full\/nature10974.html\">Spin\u2013orbital separation in the quasi-one-dimensional Mott insulator [strontium cuprate]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>1. Electron Splitting Research Team: J. Schlappa, K. Wohlfeld, K. J. Zhou, M. Mourigal, M. W. Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Monney, S. Nishimoto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J.-S. Caux, L. Patthey, H. M. R\u00f8nnow, J. van den Brink &amp; T. Schmitt<\/p>\n<p>Do I hear a Nobel Prize ringing ? :-)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Update April 4, 2016: Experimentalists have just <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171205174322\/https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2016\/04\/160404111559.htm\">separated an Electron into smaller particles<\/a>, more easily and apparently sufficiently so that the Electron subcomponents can be used in human scale devices ! They refer to the result as a <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20171205174322\/https:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2016\/04\/160404111559.htm\">new state of matter called &#8220;quantum spin liquid<\/a>.&#8221; More later.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><center>______________________________________________<\/center>Related articles:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/three-quarks-dont-add-up-to-one-proton-not-even-close\/\">Why Don\u2019t Three Quarks Add Up to One Proton? (and its not even close)<\/a>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theonion.com\/article\/haggar-physicists-develop-quantum-slacks-311\">Haggar Physicists Develop &#8216;Quantum Slacks&#8217;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>And a book\u00a0(this website will get a few dimes if you buy it here.)<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/History-Electron-J-G-Thomson\/dp\/1107005221\/ref=as_li_ss_il?ref_=nav_signin&amp;&amp;linkCode=li2&amp;tag=dilwosinspila-20&amp;linkId=44b6dd2324e956f8eeacbbb9e847fb55\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/widgets\/q?_encoding=UTF8&amp;ASIN=1107005221&amp;Format=_SL160_&amp;ID=AsinImage&amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;WS=1&amp;tag=dilwosinspila-20\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;\" src=\"https:\/\/ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com\/e\/ir?t=dilwosinspila-20&amp;l=li2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1107005221\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\" \/>es<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Amazing news: Researchers in Switzerland have separated an Electron into two smaller quasi-particles &#8211; a &#8220;Spinon&#8221; and an &#8220;Orbiton;&#8221; meaning they have physically separated the spin and the orbit properties of an Electron. Until now, standard physics generally accepted that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/electron-is-not-a-fundamental-particle\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":437,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[13,20],"tags":[139,140,144,136,142,141,143,135],"class_list":["post-2967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-basic-science","category-particles","tag-electron","tag-fundamental-particle","tag-holon","tag-matthew-fisher","tag-orbitron","tag-spinon","tag-strontium-cuprate","tag-thorsten-schmitt"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2967"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2967\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7699,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2967\/revisions\/7699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}