{"id":2,"date":"2011-01-13T14:08:08","date_gmt":"2011-01-13T21:08:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/?page_id=2"},"modified":"2026-02-18T13:02:47","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T21:02:47","slug":"about","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/about\/","title":{"rendered":"About"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Welcome to the News and Discussion part of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cosmologyscience.com\/\">CosmologyScience.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>CosmologyScience.com is the Best Cosmology Blog due to its unbiased high-quality content, expertise in the field and unique presentation of both sides of the Big Bang debate.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Cosmology Dynamics DeMystified<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This website helps <b>demystify <\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cosmologyscience.com\/glossary.htm\">Cosmology principles<\/a>, news and <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jargon\">jargon<\/a> by explaining the concepts as clearly and meaningfully as possible &#8211; <strong>without sacrificing any scientific accuracy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>If you haven&#8217;t been able to clearly understand Cosmology principles so far &#8211; <em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">its not your fault. <\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>After studying hundreds of cosmology books and countless articles, it is my considered opinion that most cosmology is written in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vocabulary.com\/dictionary\/gratuitous\">gratuitously<\/a> (needlessly) opaque or obscure language, typically disguised with mathematics; by academics trying to impress or intimidate other academics. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>That&#8217;s pretty much the exact opposite of a recipe for helping <\/strong><strong>others understand. It would be entirely reasonable to imagine that at least some of that\u00a0<\/strong><strong>was intentional.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The resources here can help you understand how to distinguish between genuine science knowledge &#8212; from ideas that are <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">not<\/span> based on experimentally derived observations, which is useful because there are more than a few science-fiction <strong>ideas<\/strong> in cosmology masquerading as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cosmologyscience.com\/glossary.htm#Science\">fact<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>You might even find some ideas that get you to stop and think.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www2.lse.ac.uk\/philosophy\/about\/lakatos\/scienceAndPseudoscienceTranscript.aspx\">the hallmark of scientific behaviour is a certain scepticism even towards one&#8217;s most cherished theories. Blind commitment to a theory is not an intellectual virtue: it is an intellectual crime.<\/a><\/strong>&#8221; &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Imre_Lakatos\">Imre Lakatos, Leading Philosopher of Science<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">No Math Needed<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The articles here are written for a Scientific American reading level. Most math is removed, any math remaining you can safely ignore. Nor will you get slowed down by phrases such as &#8220;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Newton's_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_3rd_Law\">Newton&#8217;s 3rd law<\/a><\/strong>.&#8221; Instead you should always find explanations in <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Plain_English\">plain English<\/a><\/strong>; as in this case &#8220;<strong>every action has an equal and opposite reaction.<\/strong>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For further research you can find abundant links here with references to the best available cosmology and astrophysics science.<\/p>\n<p>No AI Either &#8211; as in Zero, Zilch, Nada.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Astrophysics Avalanche<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>No person with a real life could keep up with every week&#8217;s avalanche of new astrophysics papers. (Although <a href=\"https:\/\/cosmology.info\/org\/acg-organization.html\">Louis Marmet gives it a good go<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>So I curate (and translate into plain English) what I believe are the most important papers for Cosmology, our small subset of astrophysics.<\/p>\n<p>If you learn of something I&#8217;ve overlooked &#8211; I welcome you to let me know. Thank you<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>And Gosh Darn It, People Like This<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>In terms of a horse race, I am rather delighted to report that as of August 2015, <strong>this Cosmology blog passed Scientific American&#8217;s Cosmology Blog in popularity <\/strong>\u00a0!<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, it comes in reliably third (and <strong>first in Google, Yahoo, Bing<\/strong> and most other search engines) in a clean web search (no-cache, no-cookies) for &#8220;<strong>best Cosmology Blog<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Be my guest, go ahead, try it. (It also comes up reliably <strong>ahead of Cosmology Blogs by Discover Magazine, Kavli Institute, Stephen Hawking, Sean Carrol,<\/strong> Peter Woit, and Ned Wright. <strong>We&#8217;re Number One<\/strong> !!! That&#8217;s just too flipping cool !)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Privacy<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The website is <strong>free<\/strong>, has no popups or spam and <strong>we seriously protect your privacy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>We may soon slowly add relevant ads for high quality books and other things helpful to understanding and enjoying science-based cosmology, in part because it may help defray some expense of maintaining this website for you.<\/p>\n<p>If this sounds appealing, you can subscribe &#8211; currently for Free.<\/p>\n<p><center><strong>P.O. Box 100, Carmel, California 93921<\/strong><\/center><center><br \/>\n<strong>Copyright 2006-2018 David Dilworth &#8212; ScienceBasedCosmology.com<\/strong><\/center>Notes:<\/p>\n<p>1. <a href=\"http:\/\/heritage.stsci.edu\/gallery\/gallery.html\">The banner images are from Hubble Heritage: &#8220;NASA, ESA, and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI\/AURA).&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Headline banner&#8217;s leftmost image is the <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lagoon_Nebula\">Blue Lagoon Nebulae<\/a><\/strong>,<br \/>\nthe middle image is <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Messier_66\">Galaxy M66<\/a><\/strong>,<br \/>\nthe rightmost image is the <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carina_Nebula\">Carina Nebulae<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>2. The colors, while lovely, are not quite natural. They are (<a href=\"http:\/\/heritage.stsci.edu\/commonpages\/infoindex\/ourimages\/color_comp.html\">beautifully) adjusted to dramatize the phenomena, typically by Hubble Heritage staff or volunteers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3. I&#8217;m pleased to report that in August 2012 the article (&#8220;<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/iau-not-interested-in-big-bang\/\"><strong>International Astronomical Union has no Definition for Big Bang<\/strong><\/a>&#8220;)<strong> reached its 75,000th reader<\/strong> (75,000 different IP addresses that were not bots or crawlers). As of January 2017, <strong>more than 20 articles on this\u00a0site have been seen by more than 5,000 distinct readers.<\/strong> Maybe that&#8217;s why a web search for &#8220;<strong>best cosmology blogs<\/strong>&#8221; this one shows up reliably ahead of Scientific American !<\/p>\n<p>Amusingly, sometime April, 2015 the not-exactly-a-cosmology-article &#8220;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/comparing-total-number-of-stars-with-grains-of-beach-sand\/\">Stars or Sand? Are there more Grains of Beach Sand or Stars in our Visible Universe<\/a><\/strong>?&#8221; had its <strong>100,000th reader<\/strong> ! What a nice landmark. (Only a couple of months later, as of Sept 2015, the article rapidly increasing in popularity, now has over <strong>200,000 reads\/views !<\/strong> That&#8217;s just too cool.) Similarly, a web search for &#8220;<strong>what is an electron made of<\/strong>&#8221; the microphysics article &#8220;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/electron-is-not-a-fundamental-particle\/\">Electron No Longer a Fundamental Particle ?<\/a><\/strong>&#8221; shows up <strong>above the Wikipedia article on Electrons<\/strong> and most of the physics blogs !<\/p>\n<p>More satisfying for me is the groundbreaking expose &#8220;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/cosmic-microwave-angular-resolution-surprise\/\">Cosmic Microwave Radiation Surprise<\/a>&#8221; article has had more than 10,000 readers. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This website itself now attracts well over 20,000 page views per month.<\/p>\n<p>4. I realize a few scientists in other fields may consider demystification a threat to their field &#8212;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/ideas\/episodes\/2009\/01\/02\/how-to-think-about-science-part-1---24-listen\/#episode1\"><strong>Demystification is often treated as catastrophic undermining.<\/strong>&#8221; -Simon Schaffer, How To Think About Science &#8211; regarding &#8220;The Science Wars<\/a>&#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>However cosmology seems to have much nicer characters. I have yet to hear a &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20160719204503\/https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ArgMK2kAjzw\">discouraging word<\/a>.&#8221; To the contrary, I&#8217;ve had lots of encouragement &#8211; both inside and outside the field.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you for your interest and support.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to the News and Discussion part of CosmologyScience.com CosmologyScience.com is the Best Cosmology Blog due to its unbiased high-quality content, expertise in the field and unique presentation of both sides of the Big Bang debate. Cosmology Dynamics DeMystified This &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/about\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":7,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"iawp_total_views":8,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-2","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7736,"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2\/revisions\/7736"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cosmologyscience.com\/cosblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}