Age is 15.84Gyears.

Mass = 2.025E53 kg,

Radius=150GPm,

Density=60E-27 kg/m^3

E=[c,V][ ,P]=[-vp,cP]=[-mGM/r,cP]

Dark Matter=cP vector energy. ]]>

Your claim that the size of an atom and the size of a galaxy are irrelevant to the universe is patently false. The universe is quite concerned with the scale of things. It’s that very concern that gives rise to the structure and nature of our universe in fact. The reason is that fundamental forces have ranges of influence. A galaxy is affected by the gravitational force predominately where as an atom is dominated by the strong and electroweak forces.

]]>H=2/Xs and v=Hd=d/T and T=d/v=R/c. ]]>

Pensive it mentioned below the website blogs little serving as an example of my present research results. The Universe is Infinitesimal & Infinite. Cosmology encyclopedia scientific data and information those are relevant to better civilization is highly needed. This will be reputable for Nobel Prize & World Conference.

Please see into- https://shahidurrahmansikder.wordpress.com/2018/06/24/the-universe-is-infinitesimal-or-infinite/

]]>Thank you for your clever reasoning Val.

It reminds me of Bertrand Russel’s Paradox that destroyed Hilbert’s maxim

that everything could be described with formal mathematics.

Cheers.

You will be very surprised at the universe concepts this simple Hubble equation opens up.

Very kind regards to you both, David Hine ]]>

There is now a very simple way to calculate Hubble’s Constant, by inputting to an equation, the numerical value of Pi and the speed of light (C) from Maxwell’s equations, and the value of a parsec. NO space probe measurements (with their inevitable small measuring / interpretation errors) are now required. Hubble’s Constant is ‘fixed’ at 70.98047 PRECISELY. This maths method removes the errors / tolerances that is always a part of attempting to measuring something as ‘elusive’ as Hubble’s Constant. This has very deep implications for theoretical cosmology.

The equation to perform this is :- 2 X a meg parsec X light speed (C). This total is then divided by Pi to the power of 21. This gives 70.98047 kilometres per sec per meg parsec.

The equation to perform this can also be found in ‘The Principle of Astrogeometry’ on Amazon Kindle Books. This also explains how the Hubble 70.98047 ‘fixing’ equation was found. David. ]]>

Thank you for your encouraging comment JD.

One thing that always stuns me about the Penzias-Wilson Nobel – their paper described exactly one data point.

Decades ago I attended a lecture by Arno Penzias who got a Nobel Prize for the 3˚ blackbody discovery. When asked “what existed before the big bang”, he declared “Before the big bang, space, time, matter and energy did not exist”. Got that? Pure metaphysics, just like the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction, and Einstein’s relativity. Our physics has gone wacky, ever since the cosmic ether was prematurely discarded and erased. Am studying the work of Dayton Miller, top scientist of the 30s and 40s, who did the best job of measuring the ether-drift, proved it was so. All he got for his painstaking work was a stick in the eye.

Cheers, JD

How do you know that there are no “absolute truths?” If you know this absolutely, then your claim is false. And if you do not know this absolutely, then there might be absolute truths. And I am absolutely sure.

]]>Because they lose energy by gravitational radiation, says Einstein. This is known by everybody. But the same goes for e.g. an electrostatic field, in which electrostatically charged bodies are moving. IT’s easy to construct experiments to verify this theory.

We know that light has a gravitational field of their own, as photons bend round heavy bodies. Experiments also show attraction between two anti-parallel laser beams, which also shows photons to have a gravitational field of their own. Consequently photons loose energy when they travel in space. Slowly light is increasing its wavelength and becoming redder.

Professor Jian-Miin Liu, (from the Nanjing University) since a quarter of century, has placed papers on the internet, building entirely on Einstein’s GTR, indicating that there is no expansion of the universe.

Here the redshift is mathematically described by an exponential function, which can be derived, hence the “accelerating expansion”. Prof. Liu’s explanation of the redshift is completely scientific, builds entirely on proven scientific theory. The Big Bang hypothesis on the other hand builds on at least seven (7) miracles, of which their ought to be none in science.

So: Hubble was right, the redshift is not Doppler effect.

The absolute silence of the scientific world in this case of prof. Jian-Miin Liu is extremely remarkable. Here the Big Bangers show clearly, that they are not interested in science, more patting the backs of their Big Bang chums.

]]>Theories:

1) Modern Big Bang Theory

2) Modern Evolution Theory

3) Modern Gravitational Theory

4) Modern Time Dimension Theory

1) Modern Big Bang theory: “Beginning of the creation a part of the power of the Allah/God became divisible as a result of the big bang”. At the time of the beginning of the creation or from the absolute zero of time or from the big black hole or from the Nature or From the God, part of the power of the Nature/God/Allah became divisible as a result of the big bang. The part of energy had been divided in the beginning of creation from the large field of energy, which is below 50% of total energy. As I see it- Dark Energy 75% Dark Matter 21% Normal Matter 4 %. In the most of natural power reserved in Allah or Nature or Big Black Hole or the God from which, the world of gravitation become influenced.

2) Modern Evolution Theory: Everything of the world of matter is the result of evolution from the Allah/God” i.e. everything at all always is changing in the universe. The changing function of the universe is going on always i.e. everything of the real world is always evolving changing and by overcoming the steps of change come various faced physics.

3) Modern Gravitational Theory: “Gravitational worlds, they are moving or changing the orbit with their all family members depending on the nuclear of each other”. In this way- There has been incidence of full view of the universe at the very exact copy/invitation of the visible diagram solar system in the gravitation world.

4) Modern time dimension theory: “An individual respective very location is the present and the rest all the locations are of the deep of the past” That is to say; Location of oneself is the present and all other remaining places have dived inside the deeper parts of the past of all. That is to say; inside the universe, the environment situation of today’s our home planet is present before us but the same moment outside the home planet is the past of all. That is to say; place of each in the space is the present of oneself and everybody is at the location of the past of all.

If you understand the above facts, you will get the shape of present picture of the universe. In this circumstance, a question may be arisen that the field of single energy dimension how occurred? What were in the past of Allah/God? In that case there is no answer because it is not possible to take back our imagination power before it. So, it is only one answer of this question that the power himself is standing behind it.

Model: See my blog “Universe Figure” https://shahidurrahmansikder.wordpress.com

See my DEMO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYcnbwUKUEM

New Discovery of the Universe: can be found at http://lnkd.in/Sn6wPK

Shahidur Rahman Sikder (author)

Phone: 8801915788163

Digital Universe, 42/2 Baitul Flah Mosque Road, East Shah Ali Bag, Mirpur-1, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh

Home Page: http://www.universalrule.info

Twitter: https://twitter.com/beyondeinstein

Face book: https://www.facebook.com/shahidurrahman.sikder

Quaternion math goes back to the Irish physicist William Rowan Hamilton who

tried to extend the complex numbers to 3 dimensions. Realizing that this led to

contradictions, he discovered that an extension to 4 dimensions was possible.

Somewhat later, Thomas Graves and Arthur Cayley discovered that an extension to

8 dimensions (octonions) was possible, as well.

Adolf Hurwitz, working at ETH Zurich, published in 1895 a famous paper where

he proved that complex numbers, quaternions, and octonions are the only possible

composite algebras having a multiplicative norm, i.e. having a “vector product”

wherein the length of the product of two vectors equals the product of the

lengths of the vectors.

It is less known that these composite algebras are backed by simple number

identities, noteworthy the 2-squares identity, going back to Diophantes,

the 4-squares identity, discovered by Leonhard Euler, and the 8-squares

identity, discovered by Ferdinand Degen.

The quaternion multiplication rule:

(a0 + ia1 + ja2 + ka3)* (b0 + ib1 + jb2 + kb3) =

(a0 b0-a1 b1-a2 b2-a3 b3 )+

i(a0 b1+a1 b0+a2 b3-a3 b2 )+

j(a0 b2-a1 b3+a2 b0+a3 b1 )+

k(a0 b3+a1 b2-a2 b1+a3 b0 ).

if squared, (a*b)*(a*b)”= a*(b*b” )*a” yields, according to

q*q”= q”*q= (q0^2+ q1^2+ q2^2+ q3^2 ) EULER’s 4-Squares-Identity

(proof by algebraic evaluation):

(v0^2+v1^2+v2^2+v3^2 )(w0^2+w1^2+w2^2+w3^2 )=

(v0 w0-v1 w1-v2 w2-v3 w3 )^2 +

(v0 w1+v1 w0+v2 w3-v3 w2 )^2 +

(v0 w2-v1 w3+v2 w0+v3 w1 )^2 +

(v0 w3+v1 w2-v2 w1+v3 w0 )^2 .

Hence, Maxwell’s equations in 4-space are derivable from a simple

algebraic number identity!

E.g. the gradient δ*A of the 4-potential A is:

(δ0+iδ1+jδ2+kδ3 )*(A0+iA1+jA2+kA3 )=

((δ0 A0- δ1 A1- δ2 A2- δ3 A3 ) +

i(δ0 A1+ δ1 A0+ δ2 A3- δ3 A2 ) +

j(δ0 A2+ δ2 A0- δ1 A3+ δ3 A1 ) +

k(δ0 A3+ δ3 A0+ δ1 A2- δ2 A1 )).

The first line being zero, this equals to the electromagnetic 4-field:

δ*A=i(E1/c+ B1 )+j(E2/c+ B2 )+k(E3/c+ B3 )

in source (E/c) and curl (B) parts.

Source and curl correspond to the two parts of an isoclinic double-

rotation around a point in 4-dimensional space.

The square, (δ*A)*(δ*A)”= (E⁄c)^2+B^2, is twice the energy of

the electromagnetic 4-field.

Electrodynamics can be as simple as that, and this knowledge is more than

a century old. Why was there no follow-up on this road after Hamilton?

I suppose here an ideological reason at work (which is still active in some parts

of the world): some scientists wanted to make physics without metaphysics!

Quaternions (and the 4-squares identity on which they are based) provide for

an exact accountability of entities (the multiplicative norm). Which means

that they obey a built-in metaphysical principle, that being must be conserved

under transformation. A quaternion is furthermore a 4-dimensional rotation

operator, which effects an isoclinic double-rotation of a 4-dimensional vector

on which it operates. A rotation of a rotation is furthermore a rotation again.

Movement within being is necessarily rotation; otherwise being would need to

move with respect to something other – but there is nothing outside being.

Quaternions nicely show how movement takes place within being, and

hence how physics is built upon metaphysics. The beginning of the

20th century was ideologically polarized and not at all favorable to

metaphysical thoughts; metaphysics was just done away as being “non-scientific

Spiritism”. Ernst Mach (who strongly influenced Albert Einstein) had

set physics on a radically positivist track, whereon no absolute state

of movement was admitted, and every measurement was assumed to be relative.

Only with the advent of Quantum Mechanics, absolute quantities

came back to physics again; rotation being an absolute and quantized

state of movement.

Now we are slowly finding our way back to a more realist physics,

built on being, movement and autonomy (life, spirit); all three

present in the Universe. The 2-square, 4-square, and 8-square identities

show how movement is present within being without leading to

contradiction. The more interesting question, however, is, how

autonomy (life, spirit) is present within movement!

This is where mankind’s future research efforts should be directed at!

Because, if we, humans, designate ourselves as living and intelligent beings,

the Universe, which brought us forth, must have life and intelligence in

a far bigger extent than we have!

Yours Sincerely

Edgar Mueller

]]>I’m a theoretical physicist I’m in the process of publishing a new paper this week. That proves the connection between galaxies and atoms. Not some quack Theory real proof mathematically empirically and every way possible. The size of a Galaxy or the size of an atom is irrelevant to the universe they are the same. This being so. Leads me to question when we tear apart Atoms what are we really doing to the universe. During my scientific investigation in other areas, I found a lot of information that leads me to think at least the void that we are in the middle of now. Maybe directly related to our actions on Earth. If I am correct it’s very serious. It would at least warrant a small investigation on your part just on the off-chance that I’m correct. If I am correct give you the story of a lifetime and I’m always correct. ]]>