However, few have ever read this original paper, or the several other articles and books considered cosmology landmarks of past century.
These papers are so rarely read perhaps because to find them, it often takes quite a bit of effort and expense. One sad result is that many of these important papers are seriously misunderstood; particularly about which topics were and were not actually discussed, and whether the papers reported on experiments or observations or were merely theorizing.
To help you clarify this for yourself here are a few primary cosmology papers for your intellectual appetite and entertainment.
Part 1 covers Spectral Line Redshift, Galaxy Radial Velocity, Space Curvature, Universe Expansion, Large-scale Structure – Walls, Voids, Sheets and Filaments, Plasma Cosmology, Cosmic Microwave Radiation, Observational, Cosmic Microwave Radiation, Analysis, Cosmic Microwave Radiation, Whole Sky Map, Nucleosysnthesis, Galaxy Rotation Curves Interpreted as Missing Mass and Dark Matter, Steady State model, Quasi-Steady State model, Olbers Paradox, and General Relativity.
Even earlier, in 1895, a co-founder of Astrophysical Journal, James Edward Keeler, obtained redshifts for Saturn’s rings (A Spectroscopic Proof of the Meteoric Constitution of Saturn’s Rings) — essentially the first use of Doppler effect to measure astronomical object velocity.
“A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Hubble, Edwin (1929) Note how this paper does not discuss Universe Expansion. (Hubble in part, used Slipher’s high quality 1913 redshift data.)
“O KPИBИ ЗHE ПPOCTPAHCTBA (On the Curvature of Space),” Friedmann, Alexander (1922) manuscript in original Russian. Analysis; not an experiment.
“Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques,” Lemaître, Abbe’ Georges (1927 in the original French) Analysis; this is not an experiment. It is only mathematical speculations that step into physics and drew Einstein’s retort “Your calculations are correct, but your physics are abominable.”
“A homogeneous Universe of constant mass and increasing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extra-galactic nebulae,” Lemaître, Abbe’ Georges (1931, Translated by Lemaître himself.) This paper does discuss Universe Expansion. I particularly enjoy reading the last two paragraphs.
“A slice of the universe,” de Lapparent, V.; Geller, M. J.; Huchra, J. P. (1986) The first three-dimensional visualization of filaments, voids and other large scale structure. This is better than mere Nobel Prize caliber groundbreaking work – this paper gets my vote for the most illuminating cosmology research of the past century.
“Matter-Antimatter Annihilation and Cosmology,” Alfvén, Hannes (1963) While I can’t find this book or its core work online for free, the next book covers Alfvén’s Plasma Cosmology and can be partially read online.
“A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4,080 Megacycles per Second,” Penzias and Wilson (1965) Note how this does not report any hint of a “background” separate from what is now considered foreground microwave radiation, perhaps because this work reported only a single data point: Excess energy at 7.35 centimeters wavelength (though it was reported as uniform across the entire sky at that energy and physical location). Notably, this data point is not at all close to the current plotted energy curve peak which is at about two millimeters wavelength.
“Cosmic Blackbody radiation,” Dicke, Peebles, Roll, Wilkinson (1965) Analysis only; not an experiment, no new data reported. First mention and speculation of microwave “background” and blackbody spectrum.
“Deep-Space Measurements of the Microwave Background Anisotropy – First Results of the Relikt Experiment,” Strukov & Skulachev (1984) This 8 mm wavelength satellite experiment looked for and found microwave anisotropy and a dipole (a decade before COBE), but no quadrupole.
“The Origin of Chemical Elements,” Alpher, Bethe, Gamow (1948 “spinning universe”)
“Neutral hydrogen in M 33 and M 101,” Volders, Louise M. J. S. (1959) “Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,” Rubin, Vera C.; Ford, W. Kent, Jr. (1970) “Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,” Zwicky, F., Helvetica Physica Acta, Vol. 6 (1933)
“On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae,” Zwicky, F., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 86, (1937) (It is hard to ignore Zwicky’s many disclaimers about how its essentially impossible to even estimate a Cluster’s mass or component velocities.)
(Note: This is not an original paper, as there is strong disagreement on the origin of this idea which may have originated in the 1500s. It is a recent overview paper, but does not include any references of more than 50 years age. )
Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Einstein (1915) The defining paper of General Relativity with the final Field Equations in the original German/Deutsch. Analysis; this is not an experiment.
The Field Equations of Gravitation (translated to English)
A simple overview of Relativity by Einstein, translated by Robert William Lawson “Relativity: The Special and General Theory“
Infinite Static Universe was the “Standard Model” until roughly 1950.
At this point I feel it important to remember that for the centuries after Ptolemy’s geocentric idea, up until Lemaitre’s Expansion paper the “Standard Model” for Cosmology was the “Infinite Static Universe.” This was not Einstein’s closed and finite static universe, but a Static Universe infinite in space and time.
Recent Cosmology/Astrophysics papers:
Published on: Feb 16, 2013